Image tampering increasingly common in scientific journals

The Federal Office of Research Integrity says that 44 per­cent of its cases between 2005 and 2006 involved image fraud. That’s up from 6 per­cent a decade ago.

According to the Chronicle of Higher Education (sub­scrip­tion prob­a­bly required), out of the 300 or so arti­cles accepted each year by the Journal of Clinical Investigation, 10 to 20 may have been tam­pered with.

Some young researchers may not even think of image edit­ing as being wrong, the CHE reports, con­sid­er­ing the ease of image manip­u­la­tion. However, experts con­tend that even chang­ing a few pix­els for clarity’s sake can alter the mean­ing of that image.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Diigo
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Science fraud is com­mon and often ignored, report says
  2. Computer pro­gram devel­oped to detect art forgery
  3. Online study kits irk one Florida professor
  4. University of Virginia shut­ting down pub­lic com­puter labs to save money
  5. Pew Report: Most Americans wouldn’t care much if their local news­pa­pers disappeared
This entry was posted in Authority Issues, Higher Education, Print Culture and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Recent Comments