<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iTunes not a money maker and wouldn’t be for news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/</link>
	<description>Michael Becker writes about journalism, new media and digital culture in general.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-926</guid>
		<description>If the report I quoted is correct, stuff accounts for 1/3 of its profits for the Telegraph.  Not sure about the &quot;bit of extra money&quot; bucket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider the NYT. They probably have the highest percentage of readers, as opposed to scanners, of any mass market newspaper. Instead of just doing the book review, why not curate the best books. And sell those books to their readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Channel conflict? Not likely in a world of BN and Amazon. My sense is publishers, most especially the publishers of &quot;serious&quot; non fiction would have cheap access to their audience.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if NYT could own the serious non fiction sales channel.  Maybe a branded channel at Amazon? or at B&amp;N? or even best (from my POV)  do an deal with independent bookstores. Buy at NYT website, pick up at your local bookstore. The tech is not that hard any more. Imagine book pitches that go with relevant news stories. or NYT people pushing their own titles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds like win-win-win to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the report I quoted is correct, stuff accounts for 1/3 of its profits for the Telegraph.  Not sure about the “bit of extra money” bucket.</p>
<p>Consider the NYT. They probably have the highest percentage of readers, as opposed to scanners, of any mass market newspaper. Instead of just doing the book review, why not curate the best books. And sell those books to their readers.</p>
<p>Channel conflict? Not likely in a world of BN and Amazon. My sense is publishers, most especially the publishers of “serious” non fiction would have cheap access to their audience.  I wouldn’t be surprised if NYT could own the serious non fiction sales channel.  Maybe a branded channel at Amazon? or at B&amp;N? or even best (from my POV)  do an deal with independent bookstores. Buy at NYT website, pick up at your local bookstore. The tech is not that hard any more. Imagine book pitches that go with relevant news stories. or NYT people pushing their own titles.</p>
<p>Sounds like win-win-win to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-925</guid>
		<description>I agree that newspapers can sell anything they want to to make a bit of extra money, but that sort of secondary market exists for iPods and iTunes as well (with all the accessories and addons and gidgets and gizmos you can buy). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still wondering, if we take the iTunes model and apply it straight to newspapers and assume that the &quot;iTunes for news&quot; is meant as a gateway to get people to buy some more expensive product, what would that product be? Could we see a partnership between major news companies and an eInk reader manufacturer? Between the MSM and Amazon&#039;s Kindle, Sony&#039;s eReeader?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that newspapers can sell anything they want to to make a bit of extra money, but that sort of secondary market exists for iPods and iTunes as well (with all the accessories and addons and gidgets and gizmos you can buy). </p>
<p>I’m still wondering, if we take the iTunes model and apply it straight to newspapers and assume that the “iTunes for news” is meant as a gateway to get people to buy some more expensive product, what would that product be? Could we see a partnership between major news companies and an eInk reader manufacturer? Between the MSM and Amazon’s Kindle, Sony’s eReeader?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Q:  what can newspapers sell?   A: Anything their readers/fans will buy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I picked this up at the Buzz Machine yesterday..&lt;br&gt;&quot;When I was last in London, I was shocked to hear that the Telegraph makes a third of its profits from merchandise sales: wine, garden sheds, and hangers (honestly). The Wall Street Journal has started selling wine.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q:  what can newspapers sell?   A: Anything their readers/fans will buy.</p>
<p>I picked this up at the Buzz Machine yesterday..<br />“When I was last in London, I was shocked to hear that the Telegraph makes a third of its profits from merchandise sales: wine, garden sheds, and hangers (honestly). The Wall Street Journal has started selling wine.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>If the report I quoted is correct, stuff accounts for 1/3 of its profits for the Telegraph.  Not sure about the &quot;bit of extra money&quot; bucket.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Consider the NYT. They probably have the highest percentage of readers, as opposed to scanners, of any mass market newspaper. Instead of just doing the book review, why not curate the best books. And sell those books to their readers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Channel conflict? Not likely in a world of BN and Amazon. My sense is publishers, most especially the publishers of &quot;serious&quot; non fiction would have cheap access to their audience.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if NYT could own the serious non fiction sales channel.  Maybe a branded channel at Amazon? or at B&amp;N? or even best (from my POV)  do an deal with independent bookstores. Buy at NYT website, pick up at your local bookstore. The tech is not that hard any more. Imagine book ptiches that go with relevent news stories. or NYT people pushing their own titles.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sounds like win-win-win to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the report I quoted is correct, stuff accounts for 1/3 of its profits for the Telegraph.  Not sure about the “bit of extra money” bucket.</p>
<p>Consider the NYT. They probably have the highest percentage of readers, as opposed to scanners, of any mass market newspaper. Instead of just doing the book review, why not curate the best books. And sell those books to their readers.</p>
<p>Channel conflict? Not likely in a world of BN and Amazon. My sense is publishers, most especially the publishers of “serious” non fiction would have cheap access to their audience.  I wouldn’t be surprised if NYT could own the serious non fiction sales channel.  Maybe a branded channel at Amazon? or at B&amp;N? or even best (from my POV)  do an deal with independent bookstores. Buy at NYT website, pick up at your local bookstore. The tech is not that hard any more. Imagine book ptiches that go with relevent news stories. or NYT people pushing their own titles.</p>
<p>Sounds like win-win-win to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Becker</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>I agree that newspapers can sell anything they want to to make a bit of extra money, but that sort of secondary market exists for iPods and iTunes as well (with all the accessories and addons and gidgets and gizmos you can buy). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m still wondering, if we take the iTunes model and apply it straight to newspapers and assume that the &quot;iTunes for news&quot; is meant as a gateway to get people to buy some more expensive product, what would that product be? Could we see a partnership between major news companies and an eInk reader manufacturer? Between the MSM and Amazon&#039;s Kindle, Sony&#039;s eReeader?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that newspapers can sell anything they want to to make a bit of extra money, but that sort of secondary market exists for iPods and iTunes as well (with all the accessories and addons and gidgets and gizmos you can buy). </p>
<p>I’m still wondering, if we take the iTunes model and apply it straight to newspapers and assume that the “iTunes for news” is meant as a gateway to get people to buy some more expensive product, what would that product be? Could we see a partnership between major news companies and an eInk reader manufacturer? Between the MSM and Amazon’s Kindle, Sony’s eReeader?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael_Josefowicz</title>
		<link>http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael_Josefowicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hypercrit.net/2009/01/19/itunes-not-a-money-maker-and-wouldnt-be-for-news/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Q: What can newspapers sell? A: Anything their readers will buy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I found this at the Buzz Machine:&lt;br&gt;&quot;When I was last in London, I was shocked to hear that the Telegraph makes a third of its profits from merchandise sales: wine, garden sheds, and hangers (honestly). The Wall Street Journal has started selling wine.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: What can newspapers sell? A: Anything their readers will buy.</p>
<p>I found this at the Buzz Machine:<br />“When I was last in London, I was shocked to hear that the Telegraph makes a third of its profits from merchandise sales: wine, garden sheds, and hangers (honestly). The Wall Street Journal has started selling wine.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
