Legal issues from any form of social network screening

This entry is part 11 of 18 in the series Bozeman Privacy Fiasco

Lora Bentley at IT Business Edge writes that even if cities like Bozeman are no longer ask­ing job appli­cants for social net­work­ing and other Web pass­words and are screen­ing just the infor­ma­tion pub­licly avail­able online, they may still find them­selves in legal trouble.

If, in the process of what some have called “screen­ing” on a social net­work­ing site, the employer inad­ver­tently comes across infor­ma­tion about the applicant’s age, race, fam­ily plan­ning, reli­gion or any other pro­tected sta­tus, and that infor­ma­tion improp­erly influ­ences the hir­ing deci­sion, they could then be liable for dis­crim­i­na­tion on state and/or fed­eral levels.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Diigo
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Playboy Offers its own Social Network
  2. A look at a few tips Bozeman gives its job applicants
  3. Bozeman approves hir­ing inves­ti­ga­tion, releases whistleblower’s e-mail
  4. Survey looks at social net­work­ing in the workplace
  5. Update on pri­vacy issues
This entry was posted in Ethics, Social Networking and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Recent Comments