Foley: “We will witness the collective suicide of scores of news organizations”

I missed this back in August, but it's worth a look even now. Stephen Foley writes in The Independent that newspapers that follow Rupert Murdoch's lead and try to charge for their content may be signing a collective suicide pact.

374716426_b3808965cf_m.jpg

It's desperate stuff. It won't work, and if newspaper executives on both sides of the Atlantic follow Mr Murdoch's apparent lead, I predict we will witness the collective suicide of scores of news organisations in the US and elsewhere.

The problem, he says, is that newspapers don't have content that people want to pay for. Most of what you see on major news sites is available elsewhere — and for free. "Many newspapers that introduce online fees without reforming what they do could end up looking little more than high-priced aggregators, a kind of Huffington Post that isn't free," he writes.

The lesson: give readers a reason to want what you produce and they might consider paying for it. Charge a fee before you've got the high-quality content and you'll lose them.

Image from World Economic Forum

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Diigo
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Web 2.0 Suicide
  2. No news is bad news
  3. Maybe paying for news online is a good thing
  4. Washington Post Sponsors Local News Site
  5. Mike Masnick: News pirates are imaginary
This entry was posted in New Media, Print Culture and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • Recent Comments