Fox News is clearly biased, writes Jacob Weisberg, editor-in-chief of the Slate Group and author of The Bush Tragedy, and reporters who value a truly fair and balanced press should avoid the network on ethical grounds.
The bias is due to Rupert Murdoch, Weisberg writes. Murdoch brought to Fox News an “Australian-British-continental of politicized media” that is “un-American.” On top of that, most criticisms aimed at the network’s coverage are met with “hoots of derision,” and evidence of the network’s bias is “brushed off and ignored.”
The worst thing about it is that Fox News’ tactics have demonstrated that biased, politicized journalism gets good ratings, so other cable networks have followed suit to some extent. Fox News has “made all of cable news unpleasant and unreliable,” Weisberg writes.
The answer, for journalists at least, should be to ignore Fox News on ethical grounds:
Whether the White House engages with Fox is a tactical political question. Whether we journalists continue to do so is an ethical one. By appearing on Fox, reporters validate its propaganda values and help to undermine the role of legitimate news organizations. Respectable journalists—I’m talking to you, Mara Liasson—should stop appearing on its programs. A boycott would make Ailes too happy, so let’s try just ignoring Fox, shall we? And no, I don’t want to come on The O’Reilly Factor to discuss it.
Judging from a quick Google search, Weisberg’s article is being headlined as calling Fox News un-America — which it does — and that particular headline is going to drive a lot of traffic to the comment section of the story on Newsweek, which is already full of defensive comments from both sides.
Some of the commenters have a good point: Other cable news networks can be just as biased as Fox News but in different ways. What I think Weisberg is saying, though, is that Fox News caused that.
I don’t know the details or the history, but I do think it would be interesting to research the coverage on CNN before Fox News came on the scene and compare that to CNN’s current coverage. I wonder if you’d a difference in the tone and bias.
Edit — Just noticed that the title on Weisberg’s story page on Newsweek is similar to the headlines I noticed in my Google search, so those provocative headlines are not really just a simplification of his essay — they’re an SEO tactic.
Jacob Weisberg criticizes bias at Fox News
Fox News is clearly biased, writes Jacob Weisberg, editor-in-chief of the Slate Group and author of The Bush Tragedy, and reporters who value a truly fair and balanced press should avoid the network on ethical grounds.
The worst thing about it is that Fox News’ tactics have demonstrated that biased, politicized journalism gets good ratings, so other cable networks have followed suit to some extent. Fox News has “made all of cable news unpleasant and unreliable,” Weisberg writes.
The answer, for journalists at least, should be to ignore Fox News on ethical grounds:
Judging from a quick Google search, Weisberg’s article is being headlined as calling Fox News un-America — which it does — and that particular headline is going to drive a lot of traffic to the comment section of the story on Newsweek, which is already full of defensive comments from both sides.
Some of the commenters have a good point: Other cable news networks can be just as biased as Fox News but in different ways. What I think Weisberg is saying, though, is that Fox News caused that.
I don’t know the details or the history, but I do think it would be interesting to research the coverage on CNN before Fox News came on the scene and compare that to CNN’s current coverage. I wonder if you’d a difference in the tone and bias.
Edit — Just noticed that the title on Weisberg’s story page on Newsweek is similar to the headlines I noticed in my Google search, so those provocative headlines are not really just a simplification of his essay — they’re an SEO tactic.