Jacob Weisberg criticizes bias at Fox News

Fox News is clearly biased, writes Jacob Weisberg, editor-in-chief of the Slate Group and author of The Bush Tragedy, and reporters who value a truly fair and bal­anced press should avoid the net­work on eth­i­cal grounds.

050922_JacobWeisberg02.jpgThe bias is due to Rupert Murdoch, Weisberg writes. Murdoch brought to Fox News an “Australian-British-continental of politi­cized media” that is “un-American.” On top of that, most crit­i­cisms aimed at the network’s cov­er­age are met with “hoots of deri­sion,” and evi­dence of the network’s bias is “brushed off and ignored.”

The worst thing about it is that Fox News’ tac­tics have demon­strated that biased, politi­cized jour­nal­ism gets good rat­ings, so other cable net­works have fol­lowed suit to some extent. Fox News has “made all of cable news unpleas­ant and unre­li­able,” Weisberg writes.

The answer, for jour­nal­ists at least, should be to ignore Fox News on eth­i­cal grounds:

Whether the White House engages with Fox is a tac­ti­cal polit­i­cal ques­tion. Whether we jour­nal­ists con­tinue to do so is an eth­i­cal one. By appear­ing on Fox, reporters val­i­date its pro­pa­ganda val­ues and help to under­mine the role of legit­i­mate news orga­ni­za­tions. Respectable journalists—I’m talk­ing to you, Mara Liasson—should stop appear­ing on its pro­grams. A boy­cott would make Ailes too happy, so let’s try just ignor­ing Fox, shall we? And no, I don’t want to come on The O’Reilly Factor to dis­cuss it.

Judging from a quick Google search, Weisberg’s arti­cle is being head­lined as call­ing Fox News un-America — which it does — and that par­tic­u­lar head­line is going to drive a lot of traf­fic to the com­ment sec­tion of the story on Newsweek, which is already full of defen­sive com­ments from both sides.

Some of the com­menters have a good point: Other cable news net­works can be just as biased as Fox News but in dif­fer­ent ways. What I think Weisberg is say­ing, though, is that Fox News caused that.

I don’t know the details or the his­tory, but I do think it would be inter­est­ing to research the cov­er­age on CNN before Fox News came on the scene and com­pare that to CNN’s cur­rent cov­er­age. I won­der if you’d a dif­fer­ence in the tone and bias.

Edit — Just noticed that the title on Weisberg’s story page on Newsweek is sim­i­lar to the head­lines I noticed in my Google search, so those provoca­tive head­lines are not really just a sim­pli­fi­ca­tion of his essay — they’re an SEO tactic.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Diigo
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Posterous
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr

Related posts:

  1. Ads in Google News search results
  2. Journalism’s woes don’t resonate
  3. Free Press
  4. Mainstream Media Seen as Unreliable
  5. Journalism ethics in social networks
This entry was posted in Ethics and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.